Despite the inescapable sense that I should have one, I have been trying to figure out what in the world I would put in a weblog, since I am not currently having a conversation with any of you. Blogging is arrogant and useless, and doesn’t create real community, just simulated dialogue and the opportunity for unaccountable fakery. So, today, it occurs to me that I will just paste in the conversations I am having, which, occaisionally, I would like to have all-in-one-place somewhere. Maybe this-where. So, let the voyeurism and vanity begin.
My friend and hero Greg writes me a few weeks ago asking about a class I’m teaching at church, and bringing up some questions about what “discipleship” is. I responded with this unsolicited encyclical (my apologies – it was a cry for help).
. . .
Well, the first two things you should know about my Sunday morning class are 1) “why” I’m teaching this class is my brotherly love for Linda, who asked me to do it and 2) I’m really only “teaching” about 5 times. I’m helping coordinate some small groups and panels the other weeks. So if you’re looking for someone who has 14 weeks worth of material on discipleship burning in his bones, it’s not me. 🙂
Last semester Bob taught on discipleship, and the class was called “Run to Him.” I don’t know what he said, but this semester they were interested in something challenging that connected faith and current events, and I suggested taking some of our practices as disciples – personal spiritual disciplines, corporate worship, and acts of service – and talking about how these things shape a uniquely Christian engagement with the world. I’m trying to give evidence that attending Sunday school, for example, makes a difference to the world as it helps make us into Jesus’ followers who enact his love for one another, enemies and strangers. I’m not using any books or resources, but the way I ramble on (see, for example, this e-mail) they are surely wishing I would. Mere Discipleship would be a great place to start.
I haven’t read Camp’s book yet, but his ghost haunted the halls of ACU while I was there (we would speak his legendary name in hushed tones), and I would say that his biggest influences (especially his PhD prof, John Howard Yoder) are also the people that most challenged my sense of discipleship. Rodney Clapp’s books are a good synthesis of this stuff, too, which looks at discipleship not only as personal morals or spiritual practices, but belonging to a community that is building a Kingdom culture in participation with God’s life in the world. A lot of the emerging church folks (Brian Mclaren, Rob Bell, etc.) are getting at Christianity through a combination of this and pre-Reformation Christian practices of spriituality and community. You may have already processed and dismissed all these guys, but I’ll keep talking about them as if you’ve never heard it before, since this is e-mail and I can’t tell if you’re nodding or making a sour face.
It’s all very rooted in Matthew 5-7 – not as a bunch of impossible rules, but as a life that witnesses to an alternative culture and blesses those in your immediate vicinity. I think since reading these guys, the next phase for me was viewing some old ideas in a new way, giving stuff like the doctrine of the trinity and the practice of solitude a sudden relevance to the way I live and relate to others. Actually, I would say that this view of discipleship saved me from coming to the conclusion that Christianity was simply not relevant to anything.
I think in the last 10 years my view of discipleship has shifted from (in caricature) a limited view of personal responsibility for the Great Commission (i.e. sharing the propositional truth of the gospel in hopes of establishing personal assent to the heavenly efficacy of baptism by immerson) and maintaining a “Christian morality” (i.e. asexuality + good American citizenship), to incorporation and cooperation in Jesus’ community embodying the inbreaking, burgeoning reign of God.
But I would confess the shift in thinking has not immediately resulted in a life of radical discipleship – I still have to get over myself, and getting to participate in all that excitement still has to do with whether I will get up in the morning and be with God or put any money in the collection plate on Sunday (which I haven’t in some time, truth to tell). Despite the new theology, it still amounts to things I learned in VBS: “Read your Bible and pray every day/ And you’ll grow, grow grow” and “All around the neighborhood/ I”m gonna let it shine.” Not to mention “Don’t be grouchy like a rooster.”
Now, what you’re left with is whether or not you’re supposed to be a destitute itenerant preacher, offering your peace to the homes that will keep you and shaking the dust from your feet of the ones going straight to hell. I think the answer is, “yes,” if you haven’t been given anything else to do. I think it’s a good idea, but Zaccheus was still a tax collector, and, as much as I hate to admit it, the Centurion was still an instrument of the Imperial war machine. But I don’t think I am called to follow them – I am called to follow Jesus, and commissioned to participate in the filling and care of the planet (by living in and contributing to making of culture and care of creation), so, hopefully , it’s ok to want to be a teacher or a fireman or a barista (I still think about it). I like to think the Centurion at least had trouble sleeping. Surely.
By the way (in case you’re still reading this e-mail), Glen Stassen is an ethicist at Fuller who writes in a similar vein to the authors mentioned above (these guys are almost all pacifists, by the way, who line themselves up in the anabaptist tradition), and he has a book called Kingdom Ethics: Following Jesus in Contemporary Context. His take on the Sermon on the Mount is that it is not a set of teachings contrasting an old and new command, but a set of (almost all) three-part teachings: the traditional teaching no one can live up to, the vicious cycle that results from the human condition, and a “transforming initiative” that defeats the vicious cycle. So, in Mt 5:21-25, you have the traditional teaching of not murdering, the vicious cycle of anger and judgment, and then the proposal that you cut enmity off at the pass through the “transforming initiative” of confronting the tension and being the one who offers grace – “as your Heavenly Father is perfect.” It turns the sermon not into a “don’t even hate/don’t even lust” diatribe but, rather, into a description of life in the Kingdom. I like it.
Here’s Clapp, Yoder, Hauerwas and Stassen at Amazon:
Clapp, A Peculiar People
Yoder, The Politics of Jesus
Hauerwas (and Willimon), Resident Aliens
Stassen, Kingdom Ethics
And here’s a website where you can do things like generate fake trivia about people you know (The Mechanical Contrivium – example: “Greg can taste with his feet”):
In the end, I desperately hope I can still be a disciple and secretly like Kelly Clarkson.
. . .
Ironically (in the ironical sense), Greg recently sent me this story about his ESL class: “This one 1st grade kid blew me away though. I asked, ‘Do you like dogs?’ and he just had to say, ‘Yes/no’ or ‘Yes, I do/No I don’t.’ But he said, ‘I like small dogs, but I don’t like big dogs.’ Some of these kids are amazing with English.”
Get that kid an editor.
Read Full Post »